CTA, SIA Blast Trump Tariffs as Bad for Smart-Home and Security
Consumer Technology Association (CTA) and Security Industry Association (SIA) say U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods will hurt the smart-home industry, especially the thermostat and security markets.
In testimonial public comment to the Office of the United States Trade Representative, the Consumer Technology Association (CTA) argues that the proposed $16 billion in tariffs by President Trump on electronics goods and the corresponding reactive tariffs by China will negatively impact businesses and consumers, and fail to correct the achieved result of curbing China’s unfair business practices.
Meanwhile, SIA has identified 56 categories of equipment in the proposed tariffs that will negatively affect security dealers.
Overall, the Trump Administration is proposing $50 billion in tariffs against China.
“The tariffs will also harm millions of U.S. businesses and workers across every sector that use innovative technology products to increase productivity, as well as consumers who depend on connected devices to access the internet on a daily basis,” say CTA president and CEO Gary Shapiro and CTA vice president of international trade Sage Chandler.
“China is the exclusive or primary of a range of goods that Americans enjoy every day, from cell phones to household goods. Tariffs on these products will put consumers at risk of price increases on numerous consumer goods, raising most Americans’ cost of living. Tariff-driven price increases will boost inflation, and the impact will fall disproportionately on older and lower-income Americans who are more likely to rely on lower-cost Chinese imports,” he says in the letter. “Ironically these tariffs will harm the industries they seek to protect while failing to influence China's behavior or help the administration's stated goal of eliminating China’s discriminatory trade practices.”
CTA cites data from the National Retail Federation that says the Trump administration’s proposed tariffs on Chinese imports, coupled with retaliation promised by China, would reduce U.S. gross domestic product by nearly $3 billion and destroy 134,000 American jobs annually.
“The report finds that four jobs would be lost for every job gained,” say Shapiro and Chandler.
SIA Targets 56 Product Categories
For its part, SIA is in the process of trying to get exclusions from the USTR from Section 301 tariffs on $34 billion in Chinese goods imported to the United States.
In effect as of Friday, July 6, an additional 25-percent tariff applies to 56 tariff subheadings identified by SIA as impacting security-related products.
USTR is now considering exclusion requests “to address situations that warrant excluding a particular product within a subheading, but not the tariff subheading as a whole.”
Since exclusions will be made on a product and not a company basis, exclusions will apply to all imports of the product regardless of whether the importer filed a request.
The exclusion process has the following important dates and features:
- The public will have 90 days to file a request for a product exclusion; the request period will end on Tuesday, Oct. 9.
- Following public posting of the filed request on regulations.gov, the public will have 14 days to file responses to the request for product exclusion. After the close of the 14-day response period, interested persons will have an additional 7 days to reply to any responses received in support of or opposition to the request.
- Exclusions will be effective for one year upon the publication of the exclusion determination in the Federal Register and will apply retroactively to July 6.
In evaluating requests, USTR will consider whether:
- A product is available from a source outside of China
- The additional duties would cause severe economic harm to the requestor or other U.S. interests
- The particular product is strategically important or related to Chinese industrial programs including “Made in China 2025”
Thermostats and Security Motion Sensors in Crosshairs
Getting into specifics, CTA calls out two particular product categories that will be detrimentally affected: thermostats and security motion sensors.
The thermometer tariff line (HTS 9025.19.80) covers a broad range of consumer goods, including outdoor thermometers, kitchen meat thermometers, digital thermometers for kids, and temperature sensors used in household thermostats.
“Americans purchase 17 million thermostats each year to help manage energy costs, and thermostats are already subject to a 25 percent tariff (which took effect on July 6). Tariffs on thermostats will hurt U.S. consumers by imposing a double burden of (1) higher prices on a consumer necessity, and (2) higher energy bills because consumers will be less able to afford energy-efficient smart thermostat systems. Tariffs will also harm the retailers who sell these consumer goods, as well as the small businesses who install thermostat systems,” say Shapiro and Chandler.
He continues, “A similar case can be made against the proposed tariffs on motion sensors (HTS 8543.70.45), a product which comprises a core part of home security systems that millions of Americans purchase to enhance household safety. U.S. sales of motion sensors and home security systems reached $4.69 billion in 2017. As with thermometers, tariffs on motion sensors will subject U.S. consumers to higher prices and compromise household safety. These tariffs will likewise hurt the retailers and small business installers who sell and install home security systems by increasing prices and depressing demand."
The association recommends the Trump Administration, "engage China on specific, concrete issues to achieve the elimination of its laws and regulations that discriminate against U.S. businesses. The administration has unique opportunities to leverage multilateral action, join strategic trade agreements and aggressively promote existing enforcement programs, all of which will disincentivize China’s troubling trade behavior without risking the economic future of U.S. companies and workers."
Jason has covered low-voltage electronics as an editor since 1990. He joined EH Publishing in 2000, and before that served as publisher and editor of Security Sales, a leading magazine for the security industry. He served as chairman of the Security Industry Association’s Education Committee from 2000-2004 and sat on the board of that association from 1998-2002. He is also a former board member of the Alarm Industry Research and Educational Foundation. He is currently a member of the CEDIA Education Action Team for Electronic Systems Business. Jason graduated from the University of Southern California. Have a suggestion or a topic you want to read more about? Email Jason at firstname.lastname@example.org
Follow Jason on social media:
Control & AutomationProduct Briefs: Magnavox Roku TVs; Luxul Firmware Updates; SI Short-Throw Solo Pro
CEO Interview: The Scoop on AVAD, WAVE Electronics Merger
Marine Corps Major and Paralympic Gold Medalist Receives Customized ELAN Controlled Smart Home
Crestron Pyng OS2 Takes Center Stage at Resi Summit
Where’s the Gear? 16 Electronics Components that Hide in the Home
View more on Control & Automation
Take Our Latest QuizzesHow Well Do You Understand Ethernet Cables and Connectors?
Quiz: Is Your Company Performance Above or Below Average?
How Much Do You Know About Cell Phone Signal Boosters?
How Efficient Is Your Service Department? Take the Quiz
5G and the Need for Cellphone Signal Boosters—Do You Know Enough?