Microsoft Hohm Still Silly Even with Actual Product
What the PR people say: “The PowerCost Monitor and WiFi Gateway pull consumers’ power use data into their Microsoft Hohm profile, where charts and graphs make it easy to track consumption patterns and see changes in real time.”
In my first story about Hohm, I inferred from the press release that the service was “little more than a Web site with ideas on how to save energy.”
You enter a ton of information like the square footage of your home, the types of appliances you own, and your blood type (OK, not that), and Microsoft basically tells you how much money you could save by installing more energy efficient windows.
After an interview with Troy Batterberry, product unit manager for Microsoft Hohm, I still found little value with the service, not the least because there were no real products to personalize your energy profile.
Now there is: the PowerCost Monitor and WiFi Gateway from Blue Line Innovations ($249).
And still, Microsoft Hohm is a silly offering.
According to the Microsoft press release:
The Blue Line PowerCost Monitor attaches to a household power utility meter; no wiring is required, and no need to call in an electrician. The WiFi Gateway device wirelessly transmits energy use data to the consumer’s Microsoft Hohm account and can provide personalized energy recommendations.
And exactly what kind of valuable information might you glean from this solution?
In Microsoft’s example, you might see that “power consumption spiked when the user turned on the air conditioner at various times of the day.”
You don’t say!
“With this type of insight into energy usage, consumers are empowered to make immediate choices about how to manage their household power consumption,” Microsoft explains.
Below the chart, a tip might suggest, “Sit in a cold tub. Right now, tubs are on sale at Home Depot. Click here to save!”
RELATED:
Microsoft Hohm Off to Rocky Start
Energy management tool was weak to begin with, and the beta site that launched today is buggy. Get energy info, but only if you agree to receive ads.
Microsoft Seeks Ad Revenue with Hohm Energy Management App
Product Manager: 'If a consumer receives a recommendation to replace windows, he or she could find the system offers up local window vendors in the area ...."
Troy Batterberry on Microsoft Hohm Energy Platform
Is there any meat behind Microsoft's new Hohm application for energy management? Product manager Troy Batterberry answers questions from CE Pro
Microsoft Hohm Helps Consumers Save Money and Energy (press release)
Subscribe to the CE Pro Newsletter
Read more Energy Management stories
Electric Imp Cloud-based Automation Monitors Almost Every DeviceLED Lighting: 4 Simple Ways to Boost Sales
Eragy Launches Control4 Energy Management Apps
AT&T to Launch Home Automation/Security this Summer
SDG&E and SoCal Edison: Pay to Get Your Dumb Meters Back
More in Energy Management
Article Topics
Blogs · Energy Management · Microsoft · Energy Savings · Utilities · Powercost · Hohm · Blue Line ·About the Author

2 Comments (displayed in order by date/time)
Paulb, the fake ad is actually pretty realistic (the embellishments not withstanding).
As I reported earlier: When consumers receive their personalized energy savings recommendations they could be served up advertisements powered by Microsoft Advertising platform for relevant local vendors and/or products. For example, if a consumer receives a recommendation to replace windows, he or she could find the system offers up local window vendors in the area and coupons/rebates on energy efficient windows.
http://www.cepro.com/article/microsoft_seeks_ad_revenue_with_hohm_energy_management_app/
I wasn’t slamming the product from Blue Line, rather the Hohm service from Microsoft.
It may be a good platform for future utility-related applications, but we haven’t seen it yet.
(I definitely agree with you that this is “not great journalism.” That’s why we relegated this piece, and others like it, to the blog/opinion section!)



Way to slam a product you haven’t used yet with a headline and opinion as if you had. Was making up negative, fake ad content comment necessary?
Not-so great journalism.