Search CE Pro






Print  |  Email  |  Comments (18)  |  Share  |  News  |  Follow on Twitter, Facebook or RSS

CEA’s Gary Shapiro Assails Govt. Regulations, Certain Union Activities

Consumer Electronics Association chief says, we are "quickly putting our American way of life at risk."


image

Gary Shapiro, Consumer Electronics Association CEO

Gary Shapiro, CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA), has a few choice words about unions, government bailouts and free trade, and he spills them out in a commentary in yesterday's Washington Times.

During a recent trip to an impoverished India, Shapiro was reminded of just how good we have it in the U.S., with our reliable electricity, plumbing and medical care, and our wealth of creativity and enterprise.

"Yet, we are quickly putting our American way of life at risk," Shapiro writes:

In the last few months our government has spent nearly a trillion dollars we don't have to bolster a few companies considered too important to fail. We are on the verge of spending billions more to temporarily bail out three American car companies, while doing nothing to resolve their core problem -- bloated autoworker union contracts.

Shapiro rightly assails the pending "card check" legislation that would deny union members a secret ballot, and he accuses Democrats of kowtowing to the union leaders who put half a billion dollars into election coffers this season.

Gary Shapiro has some serious chutzpah.

It isn't politically correct to challenge anything vaguely related to unions or workers -- even when we know intellectually that U.S. workers ultimately suffer from purported "labor-friendly" actions, such as taxing imported goods.

My new year's resolution was to avoid controversy and try not to tick people off but I think I'm off to a bad start.

I applaud Gary's guts in sticking up for free enterprise, at a time when the popular sentiment is to "protect" ourselves through handouts, taxes, regulations and isolationism.

Gary sums it up nicely:

We have lost our way. A misplaced sense of entitlement is creating hardships that may push our innovation economy overseas. Our mounting debt is fueling our last grasp on primacy. Our laws are discouraging innovation and investment. And soon our crumbling infrastructure and faltering economy will hasten our fall from the top.


Subscribe to the CE Pro Newsletter

Article Topics

News · Associations · Associations · All topics

About the Author

Julie Jacobson, Editor-at-large, CE Pro
Julie Jacobson is co-founder of EH Publishing and currently spends most of her time writing for CE Pro, mostly in the areas of home automation, networked A/V and the business of home systems integration. She majored in Economics at the University of Michigan, earned an MBA from the University of Texas at Austin, and has never taken a journalism class in her life. Julie is a washed-up Ultimate Frisbee player with the scars to prove it. Follow her on Twitter @juliejacobson.

18 Comments (displayed in order by date/time)

Posted by 39 Cent Stamp  on  01/01  at  09:45 PM

Gary just made my list of “people i will vote for if they ever run for anything”.

Posted by Jason Knott  on  01/02  at  07:10 AM

He’s right on about the nation’s debt and the auto company situation, but contrarians would argue that the performance of the stock market, housing and banking industries in 2008 is evidence that “free market capitalism” needs mending, or more oversight at the very least.

Posted by steve  on  01/02  at  09:07 AM

Contrarians need only to look at how the government has put their hands in the “free market capitalist” system and corrupted it.  Unfettered capitalism will work if left alone.  Jason, what product does government produce?  Debt!  Ask how many of our representatives have ever written a payroll check, paid workers comp, or created a business plan for success.  I admit it isn’t perfect but it is the best system for the rugged individual who employ’s more than seventy percent of America’s work force.  I say cut government in half, get rid of all taxes except consumption (known as the fair tax) and watch industry thrive.  Unfortunately, what representative will vote for what’s right?  To me, they represent the worst of America….........

Posted by George Dumya Bush  on  01/02  at  10:12 AM

Thanks Gary. I appreciate that you didn’t mention I was in charge the last eight years and Republicans in control for six of them. We’ll try to keep this little phony diversion going and blame it on the Democrats. Come see me down at the ranch in Crawford. I owe you one.

Posted by steve  on  01/02  at  10:23 AM

Hey Dumya, I don’t believe Gary spoke to blame anyone.  If you read the article, his points are based on free market principles, not politics.  I think he is aware of who was in office the last eight years.  I would suggest studying the constitution and capitalism.  Unless, of course, you don’t agree with these principles then I truly understand your anger and hatred for those who do.

Posted by George Dumya Bush  on  01/02  at  10:35 AM

I have had my aides explain the constitution and capitalism to me. To me and VP Cheney, they are overrated, especially when it comes to civil liberties.

I am merely making an observation that my good friend and supporter Gary Shapiro has noted that:

“We have lost our way. A misplaced sense of entitlement is creating hardships that may push our innovation economy overseas. Our mounting debt is fueling our last grasp on primacy. Our laws are discouraging innovation and investment. And soon our crumbling infrastructure and faltering economy will hasten our fall from the top.”

Clearly Gary is calling for accountability and I agree with that. So who has been driving the past eight years? Who has taken a budget surplus and created an eleven trillion debt? Who called for a $700 billion socialist bailout of Wall Street with no accountability? Who overrode Republicans in Congress in denying the Big Three bailout and did it anyway?

Apparently you are an expert in such things. You call that capitalism?

Posted by Sick and tired  on  01/02  at  10:48 AM

AS a small business owner the last thirty years it seems that the companies that offer inovation and quality thrive.  People aren’t buying
Toyota because it is cheaper but because it is a better car.
So far as unfettered capitalism, every game needs some rules otherwise greed takes over. We saw this in the 20s and 30s and again now.  Basic rules allowing business of all sizes to make money.  Taxes are the price of civilization. Remember that most of our tax dollars go to the military so what half do you want to lose, defense or infrastructure.  All these broad statements don’t really help us fix the problems but simply pit one group against another, enough.  Let’s have some grownups get to the real issues and let us get back to work.

Posted by steve  on  01/02  at  11:11 AM

Dumya, they are all the culprits.  The president never passes legislation,  he merely signs it. Also, do you know the difference between national debt and deficit? Big difference.  Please have your aides educate you on that as well.  Hey Sick and tired, most of our taxes do not go to the military.  Most of our taxes go to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.  All entitlement programs that you, Dumya, myself, and all people who pay taxes have to support.

Posted by Sick and tired  on  01/02  at  11:53 AM

Once again cherry picking and partisanship are where this is going.  While we all have our own opinions the facts speak for themselves.  Combine all military (vetern affairs, war on terror, Dept of defense, etc) and it adds up to more than anything else in our budget.  go to this link and it will show you the budget for 2007 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/bc/Fy2007spendingbycategory.png
Who knows how much other spending in rolled into homeland security or somewhere else in the budget.
We need to stop laying blame on “the other side” and work together to fix the problems facing business today.  Too many talking heads are just shills for one side or another.  Blaming just the unions or just the car companies misses the real problems coming at us today.  Both polictical parties recieve money from one group or another but politicians work for the people not special interests.  Any of us can throw a few barbs to push peoples button but lets address the whole problem and not just the parts.

Posted by steve  on  01/02  at  11:59 AM

Agree….......also, look at http://www.federalbudget.com

Posted by Sick and tired  on  01/02  at  12:20 PM

Steve, this is the direction for the 21st century, people agreeing on the facts.  As we come out of the dark ages…
Happy New year

Posted by steve  on  01/02  at  12:42 PM

Sick and tired,  Happy New Year and all the success in 2009

Posted by Dale  on  01/02  at  01:31 PM

In Gary’s zeal to make his points he has butchered the facts to support his opinions. The United Auto Workers negotiated wages of $30.00 per hour for senior workers are equal to the non-union contracts of the foreign automakers that build cars in the USA, but the big 3 automakers have substantially more pension requirements as the foreign automakers have been building in the USA for far sorter periods of time (and as such they have greatly reduced pension requirements as they have fewer retired workers). Plus, in years past the UAW has agreed to tiered wages and major concessions in benefits, again equal to what the foreign automakers are paying their USA workers. Twisting the numbers, Gary and others with his same opinion, add pension payments into labor costs and come up with the disparity in hourly wages. This is unfair, and is in actuality “Voodoo Economics”. But, Gary and others with his same opinions, fail to realize that workers making good wages spend some of their money buying consumer electronics. Who would buy our home electronics products and services if wages were so low that these goods become unaffordable? Gary states high wages is the “core problem”, and this statement really makes him look foolish as most Americans know poor management of the big 3 automakers is the real cause of their failings as their hourly wage earners have no say into the design of automobiles and how their companies are run. Also, our billion/trillion dollar bailout of the financial industry makes no demand on its workers to take wage/benefit reductions (yes, there has been talk of reducing EXECUTIVE compensation, but I am sure this will only happen to a few at the very top to calm down the taxpayers). Is this fair for one industry go about business-as-usual while requiring another to cut the wages/benefits of the average worker when both industries are begging/receiving taxpayer bailouts?

Gary, as the leader of the largest trade organization for our industry really makes us in the consumer electronics industry look bad with his opinions. If Gary really believes what he was quoted as saying maybe we should find another leader that has a better grasp of basic economics and more compassion for the common man/woman who are the largest purchasers of our consumer electronics products and services.

Posted by steve  on  01/02  at  02:27 PM

dale, so what your saying is that the reason the big three on average lose 500-1100 per car and that toyota makes 1200-1500 per car is because of pensions and management? Where did you find that the Unions negotiated down to $30.  I’ve never seen that in any publication.

Posted by Innovative Audio Visual  on  01/02  at  05:26 PM

I say let them fail…they will be asking for more in a year after they spend what they got on spas and over sea “business trips”.

Page 1 of 2 comment pages  1 2 >
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Choose smileys | View comment guidelines
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please answer the question below:


Sponsored Links

  About Us Customer Service Privacy Policy Contact Us Advertise With Us Dealer Services Subscribe ©2012 CE Pro
  EH Network: Electronic House Electronic House Ideas Commercial Integrator ChannelPro ProSoundWeb Church Production Worship Facilities Electronic House Expo Worship Facilities Expo