Search CE Pro






Print  |  Email  |  Comments (4)  |  Share  |  News  |  Follow on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ or RSS

Study: LEDs Will Cut Global Electricity Demand in Half

Report says converting all existing lamps to LEDs could solve global energy crisis.


image
A new study conducted by manufacturers Osram and Siemens says that if every lamp in the world converted to LED, it would cut the global demand for electricity by 50 percent.

Those simple little light bulbs alone could solve the world’s energy crisis, the study says.

The study says, "Artificial lighting accounts for around 19 percent of global electricity consumption — that corresponds to 2.4 percent of worldwide primary energy consumption. And 70 percent of the energy used for artificial lighting is consumed by lamps for which there are more energy-efficient alternatives. Simply replacing conventional light sources with LEDs would theoretically halve global electricity consumption for lighting. The potential savings are therefore enormous."

The study also delves into the cost and environmental concerns for manufacturing, distributing, transporting and disposing of LEDs. It also examines LEDs vs. compact fluorescent lights (CFLs). Again, in both cases, LEDs are the hands-down winner, requiring very little energy to manufacturer and not containing mercury. A life cycle assessment in the study shows that it takes 25 incandescents, 2.5 CFLs to equal the same level of efficiency as a single LED bulb.

Other conclusions from the study include:
  • LED lamps are already more than five times more efficient than incandescent lamps
  • LED lamps need less than 2 percent of their energy consumption for their manufacture, meaning they are over 98 percent efficient for their task: illuminating the world
The report says that this conclusion dismisses “any concern that manufacturing of LED particularly might be very energy-intensive. In contrast to the primary energy consumption of incandescent lamps of around 3,300kWh, LED lamps use less than 700kWh.”

With the technology already at our fingertips, what is the world waiting for? The study says that Europe will be banning the manufacture of inefficient fixtures for incandescents and CFLs by 2015.

The U.S. is already phasing out incandescent bulbs. Fixtures won’t be far behind. Judging from the look of some of the lighting fixtures I’ve seen in houses, many of them should have been banned for aesthetic reasons long ago.

Subscribe to the CE Pro Newsletter

Article Topics

News · Research · Home Automation and Control · Lighting · Energy Management · Energy Management · Led · Research · All topics

About the Author

Jason Knott, Editor, CE Pro
Jason has covered low-voltage electronics as an editor since 1990. He joined EH Publishing in 2000, and before that served as publisher and editor of Security Sales, a leading magazine for the security industry. He served as chairman of the Security Industry Association’s Education Committee from 2000-2004 and sat on the board of that association from 1998-2002. He is also a former board member of the Alarm Industry Research and Educational Foundation. He is currently a member of the CEDIA Education Action Team for Electronic Systems Business. Jason graduated from the University of Southern California.

4 Comments (displayed in order by date/time)

Posted by Sabine Stochastic  on  12/04  at  10:04 AM

This article is great. Spread the knowledge. Tell your friends, families, children and client’s. Why wait until 2015, I have to go get some lights this weekend. Anybody know where I can pick up some LED outdoor flood lights? They should be cheap, I know how much LED’s cost and it’s not much.

Posted by paul  on  12/04  at  02:17 PM

Unfortunately Sabine,

LED lights are still pretty pricy.  “Basic” LED lightbulbs are ~$20-30 each, and are roughly equivalent to a 30-45 watt lightbulb.  I’m sure someone makes an LED floodlight, but I wouldn’t want to pay the asking price right now.

Posted by EntertainmentPros  on  12/05  at  06:46 PM

I may be missing something in the conservation math. I agree that LED’s are tremendously efficient, as well as the next “big thing” in lighting.
The estimates-
  “could reduce global demand by 50%”
  and then- the following statement
  “lighting accounts for 19% of consumption”

I’m not seeing how it could reduce consumption greater than the whole.
Am I losing something in the translation? I like to pass information on to help increase efficiency, but I want to pass on correct info.

Posted by Bill  on  12/07  at  09:54 AM

Here is how the math works to cut electricity consumption in half:

After spending $20 to $30 per bulb, people can no longer afford big screen TVs, electronic games, or food (i.e. no electric cooking).

The energy savings for LEDs is overstated in that we use lighting more in the winter months due to shorter days.  The heat from incandescent bulbs is released into the home where heat is needed.  It is not wasted during that time of the year.

Page 1 of 1 comment pages
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Choose smileys | View comment guidelines
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Sponsored Links

  About Us Customer Service Privacy Policy Contact Us Advertise With Us Dealer Services Subscribe ©2012 CE Pro
  EH Network: Electronic House Electronic House Ideas Commercial Integrator ChannelPro ProSoundWeb Church Production Worship Facilities Electronic House Expo Worship Facilities Expo