Kaleidescape, ‘Agents’ Enjoined from Selling, Supporting Movie Servers
Transcript: Permanent Injunction Order, DVD CCA vs. Kaleidescape
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
(UNLIMITED JURISDICTION)
DVD COPY CONTROL ASSOCIATION INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff
v.
KALEIDESCAPE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant
PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER
Case no. 1-04-CV-031829
Complaint filed: December 7, 2004
Trial date: November 14, 2011
Dept.: 16
Judge: Hon. William J. Monahan
The above-captioned Action between Plaintiff DVD Copy Control Association, Inc. and Defendant Kaleidescape, Inc. (“Kaleidescape”) (collectively “the Parties”) having been tried to the court, and having determined that Kaleidescape is in breach of the CSS License Agreement, the Court hereby enters the following Permanent Injunction pursuant to its Statement of Decision dated April 8, 2012, and Judgment entered April 8, 2012:
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Capitalized terms in this Order shall be defined in accordance with the CSS Procedural Specifications (PRX 9) unless otherwise defined herein.
a. The term “DVD Playback Product” means any device or combination of components, or software that is capable of decrypting a Disc Key, decrypting a Title Key or descrambling a Title using CSS, including without limitation any such device or combination of components or software that also performs Authentication.
b. The term “Authentication” means any application of CSS that utilizes the CSS Authentication Algorithm and Authentication Key.
c. The term “persistent copy” (of a Disc Key or Title Key(s)) means a copy that remains when playback of the Title(s) associated with such Disc Key or Title Key(s) is not occurring.
d. The term “persistent copy” (of a Title) means a copy of a Title that remains when playback of the Title is not occurring.
e. The term “playable copy” means a copy of a Title from a DVD Disc made for purposes of allowing playback of the Title without obtaining the title from the DVD Disc.
2. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 526, and California Civil Code Section 3384, to prevent casual users from making unauthorized copies of copyrighted materials recorded on CSS-protected DVD Discs, Kaleidescape, its subsidiaries and affiliated companies, including but not limited to Kaleidescape Canada, Inc., and their agents, servants, directors, officers, principals, employees, representatives, assigns, franchisees, and those acting in concert with them or at their direction, are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly making, having made, selling, offering to sell, marketing, importing or otherwise transferring any DVD Playback Product unless such DVD Playback Product:
a. obtains the Disc Key and Title Key(s) from a DVD Disc each time one or more Titles is to be played back;
b. ensures that the DVD Disc is physically present in the DVD Playback Product when playback of one or more Titles from such DVD Disc is occurring;
c. does not make a persistent copy of any encrypted or unencrypted Disc Key or Title Key(s); and
d. does not make any persistent playable copy of any Title.
Any DVD Playback Product that does not satisfy subsections 2(a) – (d) is referred to herein as “Prohibited Technology.”
3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Kaleidescape is enjoined from:
a. directly or indirectly transferring to third parties any intellectual property or know-how incorporating Prohibited Technology;
b. facilitating third parties in developing, designing, manufacturing, distributing, importing, selling, or offering to sell any Prohibited Technology;
c. using or implementing CSS to develop, design, manufacture, distribute, import, sell, or offer to sell products that make persistent playable copies of CSS-protected Titles; and
d. directly or indirectly providing any support services that include Prohibited Technology to third parties, including but not limited to the provision of the updates and upgrades to software and hardware.
4. This Court retains continuing jurisdiction over the Parties and the Actions for purposes of enforcing this Permanent Injunction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 8, 2012
[signed] Hon. William J. Monahan
Judge of the Superior Court
Subscribe to the CE Pro Newsletter
Read more Video stories
Classic Japanese-Style Home Theater Comes to Suburban PhillyTurnkey Vidabox LiivNAS Dune Edition Delivers Instant Entertainment
Inside a $3 Million Home Theater Masterpiece
AirFlex5D LLC from Elite Screens Enables Projector Stacking
Synergy Products add Versatility to Salamander Line
More in Video
Article Topics
News · Product News · Video · Digital Media · Media Servers · Legal · Kaleidescape · Dvd Cca · Drm ·About the Author

16 Comments (displayed in order by date/time)
So what is stopping Kscape from going international and bypassing the legal system?
Good job hollywood! You have outdone yourself once again! You are really good at turning customers away.
And dont think we havent been paying attention to your efforts on the digital download/streaming front…
39, your “oatmeal” post is missing one final frame. The one where the ISP sends a warning for ripping Torrents. I’ve started a collection of those. I’m sure they’ll make for some nostalgic reading when I’m serving time.
According to Kaleidescape only minutes ago via phone, their product still supports playback of sources othen than the “Prohibited Technology” since they play music and therefore they can ship product and provide support for all existing systems.
Nothing is ever really “Final” when it comes to the US Court system….
Why does this surprize anybody? The Hollywood elite have all the money but if you try to tax them (which they should in California) then they throw a fit. This stuff is all politically motivated for the far left liberials which are hollywood. Any way to destroy a private industry makes them happy.
I received this response today:
“It’s business as usual here at Kaleidescape. We are still shipping the same products and fulfilling orders. We filed our appeal on Friday and we believe the injunction order should not come into effect unless the appeals court affirms the judge’s decision. We’re looking at another year or two before we will get back in to court.
We’re going to keep fighting the fight!”
———————————————————————————-
This is a sad day for the CE industry. Love it or hate it Kaleidescape is a true innovator that is building products that people want to own. Now the courts continue to stomp all over the entrepreneur.
I’ve been waving off my clients off from buying K-scapes for years for this very reason. DVD license prohibits certain types of use. It’s explicit and anyone who doesn’t know this isn’t paying attention. If you don’t like the rules, don’t play the game. Now the real fun begins: end-users suing installers for selling heretofore obsolete servers. They will argue installers should have known K-scape was in litigation. Blood will flow.
I am very glad tgat the lord and savior has finally commented.
I’m happy Kaleidescape is ignoring the court order to stop selling it’s system. Way to give that judge the middle finger!
So where does this leave dealers? Are we really “enjoined” by this injunction? And if so, is Kal underwriting any eventual legal costs which may be incurred?
I guess it is all very well for Kal to keep going with this (seems like they don’t really have an option, other than disabling all DVD library functions), but eventually someone is going to be looking at a bill for the other parties legal fees regardless… All of a sudden the “100% legal” solution doesn’t seem quite so clear cut.
How do I explain this to my customers without them running a mile?
I found the whole 60 page statement on the DVDCCA website; the court seemed to give Kal pretty short shrift, cutting down their counter arguments to the preliminary decision very strongly indeed.
http://www.dvdcca.org/documents/DVDCCA-v-Kaleidescape-Statement-of-Decision-20120308.pdf
So the only legal way to watch a DVD is to physically have the disc in a single disc player that needs to read the data off the disc itself? A High Def version also needs HDMI and an active internet connection?
next - they will come for your DVR.
So where does that leave UltraViolet?




This makes me so angry. The DVDCCA and MPAA are so out of touch with reality but sadly they have enough money and lawyers to keep squashing new innovations. Its pretty pathetic