Recent News

Why Digital Copies (Not Downloads) Really Matter
We've had on-demand access to content for years; it's not the distribution that matters.

11.26.2008 — There's a simple misunderstanding in the battle between Blu-ray and digital downloads that clouds the obvious next step in media.

As much as we all talk about digital downloads (CE Pro included), the fact that the content is downloaded doesn't matter. They key is that the content is digital.

When it comes to what's really important with media, it's not about the distribution method, it's about the control.

On-Demand Content Isn't New; Remember Cable?


When it really comes down to it, digital media services like VUDU, Netflix's Watch Now and iTunes are separated by their distribution method: you can get them on-demand.

At a touch of your finger, you've got access to more movies, TV shows and music than you can possibly imagine. It's great to have a nearly infinite library of content at your disposal, but that's not the point.

We've had access to on-demand content for years now. Cable companies have been charging us way too much for pay-per-view since the idea surfaced.

"It's not the same," you're saying.

Well, yes and no. Sure, all of the newer services (generally) have a much more extensive library and look great -- which cable never did -- but they're still being transmitted from some server 'in the cloud' through the pipes to your house.

The distribution is the same. It doesn't matter that one comes over the cable lines and one comes over the Internet (which is probably also the cable lines).

Why Digital Matters More Than Distribution


If you're anything like me, the first day you found out you could rip your music CDs, you went through your entire disc collection to start a digital library.

With the ability to store music digitally, you had the freedom to control where/when/how you listened to your tunes. That's where DRM reared its ugly head -- the studios wanted to control your listening experience.

Thankfully, we're at a point where enough DRM-free music is available to consumers that they don't need to buy locked-down content. (Not to mention that CDs could always be ripped DRM-free.)

But now, we're coming back to that point with video content. It's nearly all specific to a platform, with the user having little control over it.

It's not like it's impossible -- people have been ripping DVDs, legal or illegal -- for years. The same thing is currently happening with Blu-ray, and manufacturers aren't going against it.

Until the Pipes Expand, Blu-ray Wins on Quality


In our blast to integrators, more said they offer Blu-ray than digital downloads because of the 1080p quality and the backup of a physical disc.

Convenience triumphed in the first digital revolution -- low-res MP3s annoyed audiophiles everywhere -- but we've moved past that. (Forget for the moment that most people can't tell audio quality differences but can see video differences.)

At this moment, the distribution pipes -- be they fiber, Ethernet or standard cable -- can't handle the best quality currently available. You can only get it on disc. And that's why ripping Blu-ray is going to be the next big thing (if it isn't already).

The movie studios aren't dumb. They're now even offering "digital copies" of their films with select DVD and Blu-ray discs. Obviously, the versions are low-res for iPods and portable media players, but that won't suffice for long.

Quality + Control = The Promise of Digital Media


When it comes to watching video, consumers want to have the best quality and the most control.

They can't control if iTunes crashes or loses any record that they purchased the content and denies access. They can't control if Comcast is having an outage in their neighborhood.

Why shouldn't you be able to stream Blu-ray quality movies throughout your house? Why shouldn't you be able to pull up your library of content pre-loaded on a media server?

The point is that it isn't the distribution method that matters. When the pipes have caught up (and the service providers change their mind on bandwidth restrictions), things may change. But we're not there yet. And we may not be.

Even if the download services are flashy and are way more functional than cable on-demand ever will be, you have to ask yourself this: are you really in control of your content?

That's what matters. That's the promise of digital media.

Subscribe to the CE Pro Newsletter

Get the latest news, products and more delivered straight to your inbox.
This entry has been viewed 5913 times.

tags
Subscribe to the CE Pro Newsletter
Subscribe to Email Alerts
Subscribe to the newsletter today! 

tagsThis Article Tagged

tagsNews Feeds

tagsSocial Bookmark
Submit to: , Digg, Delicious, Slashdot, Reddit, MyYahoo!, Google, Technorati, Learn about social bookmarking

Comments

Posted by Jez Hildred  on  11/26  at  11:20 AM

I guess the elephant in the room is the fact that digital content does not belong to the consumer. That fact and its lack of consumer recognition seems to be where most of limitations and potential disappointments originate.

I definitely take your final points about the reliability and capability of the technologies currently delivering and managing digital content. However these are areas that will improve and eventually become seamless to the consumer - assuming the content rights holders see that as in their interests.

That’s where the real issue lies as far as I’m concerned. The music and movie companies own YOUR content, not you. And they decide what is acceptable usage, at least as far as their bottom lines go. This then filters down not just in the form of DRMed files but also the sort of hardware or software solutions available ‘over the counter’ to the channel and our customers.

A detente seems to have been reached as far as music goes but video still seems to be a battlefield, where rights holders seem happy to fight their customers head-on about how video content can be handled in the home. Now just think about that for a minute - the movie industry (including DRM producers) seem to feel it’s OK to both ignore their customers’ wishes and then dictate to them how they will purchase and use video content. How many of you could run your business like that? Find a customer, ask them what they want then tell them they can’t have it but here is what they will have instead . . .

It strikes me that what will really change the game for consumers and our industry is when the rights holders start to recognize that ‘the customer is always right’ actually leads to more profit not less.

Page 1 of 1 comment pages
Post a comment

Name:

Email:

Choose smileys | View comment guidelines

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please answer the question below:

Type the last letter of the word "cable":


Rate this article
You must be logged in to rate articles. Login or register.
  • Currently 4.3/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Average score: 4.3 / Total votes: 3