Kaleidescape Brings DRM to Blu-ray Copying
Loaded into a Kaleidescape server via an M500 player, a Blu-ray disc is bookmarked and ready to play from the hard drive ... as long as the disc is in the tray.
Back to DRM and Lawsuits
The Blu-ray powers-that-be, including the AACSLA, don’t have a rule book for DRM, according to Malcolm.
“It’s just like with DVDs,” he says. “There is a set of organizations that you need to get licenses with. It’s the same old people, they just operate under another umbrella. It’s another shell organization that essentially is controlled by studios.”
As such, while the Blu-ray police run a battery of tests to ensure players meet certain performance parameters, you can’t approach “them” to vet a shiny new product.
But Kaleidescape is tiptoeing gently through the DRM landmine.
“Our strategy is to be confident that we comply with the agreements and try not to upset the studios,” Malcolm says. “They [studios] could not be worried about rent-rip-return if the disc has to be in the machine.”
Although it is quick to appease the Blu-ray gods, Kaleidescape is not about to put similar restrictions on DVD playback.
“With the DVD CCA license, we’re confident that products shipping today are within the four corners of the agreement and we comply,” Malcolm maintains.
Even so, he adds, “You never know what a court is going to do.”
The DVD loader will give Kaleidescape a nice fall-back in case the DVD CCA prevails in the lawsuit.
“If the court goes against us, this is plan ‘B’,” Malcolm says.
Regardless, a disc changer is a nice thing to have, according to Malcolm. “I have 1,200 DVDs loaded in vinyl. I’d rather have them in a loader.”
That way, the Malcolms can easily locate and eject “Dora the Explorer” for long road trips.
More on the M-Class Series
In addition to the M500 Blu-ray copier/player, Kaleidescape is coming out with the M300 player that omits the disc tray.
The M500 will retail for $3,995, or $1,000 more than its DVD-only equivalent, the 1080p Player. The M300 will retail for $2,495, or $500 more than the DVD-only 1080p Mini Player.
Both units have the processing power to render the Kaleidescape TV interface in native 1080p vs. the upscaled images rendered on current players.

M500 importer/player (bottom) and M300 player: $4,000 and $2,500 respectively
The resolution of the on-screen display (OSD) is one of Kaleidescape’s “major improvements to the UI [user interface],” says Wong. “We’ve been shipping for seven years and we haven’t really made substantial changes to the UI because customers love it.”
With the new OSD, “The cover art is much sharper, the color is brighter, and we changed the font to make it more readable,” Wong says.
The early feedback from integrators is “all fantastic,” according to Wong. “They love the user interface. They feel they can upgrade customers just on that alone.”
Still No Streaming
Enhanced processing power and new software makes the new M Class “a platform for future sources of content,” says Wong, but he’s vague when it comes to naming those “future sources.”
Integrators have been asking Kaleidescape for any kind of networking solution, either for streaming from a NAS or the Internet, or syncing with iTunes. But they won’t see that in this generation of product.
And certainly don’t expect streaming movie rentals a la Vudu or Netflix anytime soon.
“When we think of content delivered over the network,” says Wong, “we really think of it as something that people want to download and own. We view content coming from the Internet as another way to load into our system.”
The M-Class platform does not yet sync with iTunes, but “it’s still on our road map,” says Wong. Ditto for AVCHD, the format used by most high-def video cameras: “It’s on our list. There are lots of things on our list. We had to triage. Right now, we’re focused on commercially available Blu-ray. Home videos are very high on the list, especially given our focus on families with children."

One of the "major improvements to the UI"
DVD Ripping: The Whole Picture
![]() | Kaleidescape vs. DVD CCA: Judge Rules Against Movie Servers Tentative ruling in landmark DVD-copying case says Kaleidescape knew its movie servers might be in violation of DVD CCA licensing agreement that prohibits copying of DVDs. DVD Ripping: The Latest on the Legal Front This compilation of articles on the legality of DVD ripping, and related fair-use cases, will be updated continuously. Understanding the Kaleidescape, RealDVD Cases What have the courts really decided on DVD copying, and what are the implications for the future? We debunk the myths about the the two lawsuits and clarify the current legal state of DVD ripping. Is DVD 'Ripping' the Same as 'Archiving?' Is the term "ripping" generally understood as the "illegal" form of copying a disk? Likewise, is "archiving" known as the bit-for-bit "legal" way of doing it? Can You Be Sued for Helping Clients Rip DVDs? EFF attorney Fred von Lohmann explains some of the legal issues involved in selling and installing products that enable users to copy DVDs. Is Your DVD Server Legal? Manufacturers Say Yes! Developers of movie-ripping products insist their products are legal. Here's how the manufacturers justify their solutions. Copy Protection Group Sues Kaleidescape (2005) Kaleidescape has a license from the DVD CCA to employ CSS decoding in its media servers, which it does. Now, DVD CCA is suing Kaleidescape for breach of contract. Would Studios Rather We Buy DVD Ripping Products Offshore? As studios work to quash legitimate products like RealDVD, offshore providers of DVD ripping software -- like AnyDVD developer SlySoft -- are reaping the rewards. Industry Insider: DVD CCA Is an Innovation-Stifling Cartel (2005) The DVD Copyright Control Association (DVD CCA) is a bunch of bullies. The organization manages to coerce all manufacturers of DVD players to sign away their rights to innovation. | |
Subscribe to the CE Pro Newsletter
Read more Video stories
10 Reasons Coax, Not Wireless, Is Future of Video DistributionMcIntosh MX121, MX151 Control Centers Debut
Dish Network Auto Hop Skips Commercials on Hopper DVR
NavNet Adds Apple AirPlay Support to Entice U.S. Dealers
Key Digital Launches Compass Home Automation System
More in Video
Article Topics
News · Product News · Video · Blu-ray · Media Servers · Digital Rights · Digital Media · Movie Servers · Kaleidescape · Blu-ray · Dvd Cca · Drm · M300 · M500 · M-class ·About the Author

44 Comments (displayed in order by date/time)
@Flip:
I’d say that about sums it up. However, if you can think of a more elegant and less costly solution to verify ownership of physical media, I’m sure K-scape (and the rest of us)would love to hear about it.
I was expecting some sort of proof of ownership code or something to work with Blu-ray’s managed copy. The unique code would be included with each physical disc, and you could enter it to upload the disc to your server. While slightly more of a pain than before, there wouldn’t be new hardware to buy.
Of course, a working code still doesn’t guarentee that the owner still owns the media, only that it was purchased in the first place. Then there is the admin nightmare for code validation, a large number of codes in the wild means hackers can figure out how to crack it, etc etc.
sigh… for want of a legal solution…
Is it possible to be too fast and too slow at the same time? K-Scape seems to have figured how to in this case.
While I am happy to finally see a blu-ray product, I am dissapointed that the changer is so far away. K-Scape clients generally are not going to worry too much about the cost of the changer, but I feel they will be put off by having to put the discs into the tray even htough they have been ripped to the Hard Drives.
It seems they have spent a tremendous amount of time and effort on this band-aid. Personally, I would much rather of seen them release the players (Sans Ripping) until they get the changer nailed down and provided things like iTunes, Netflix and VuDu sooner than later.
Wow! I am VERY DISAPPOINTED in Kaleidescape (KAL)! They have CRIED UNCLE before the war is even over! What a bunch of Big Brother loving, “1984” implementing bureaucrats! As a FIRST GENERATION KAL owner, I ABSOLUTELY LOVE THEIR SYSTEM, even though it cost me WAY TOO MUCH. However, I WILL ABSOLUTELY NOT PURCHASE ANY TYPE OF HARDWARE, SOFTWARE or FIRMWARE that allows its MANUFACTURER, OR ANYONE ELSE FOR THAT MATTER, TO CHECK ON MY VIDEO LIBRARY or ANYTHING IN IT!!!!!!!!!! Are they really SERIOUS about this? If so, it is UNBELIEVABLE, at best, and SHOCKING at worst. It is real simple, I will just switch off my KALs and use my AppleTVs solely, from now on. FORGET THE DAMN DISKS, BLU-RAY or DVD!!! If I want to watch a HD Movie I’ll just download it from iTunes onto my AppleTVs & copy it from there to my iPad or iPod to watch it on the go. The AppleTV software interface on my TVs is already EXCELLENT so I won’t need to change anything. Sorry, KAL, it’s been a nice ride; but, FREEDOM is MORE IMPORTANT TO ME THAN YOUR RIDICULOUS DRM BOWING, COMMUNIST SCANNING & CHECKING METHODS. If I were you, I WOULD FOCUS ON WINNING THE STUPID COURT CASE INSTEAD OF INSULTING ALL YOUR CUSTOMERS WITH THIS “FREEDOM OF OWNED USE” ROBBING GARBAGE! Also, THE STUDIOS AND THEIR DRM BOARD IDIOTS HAD BETTER TAKE NOTICE NOW! I would rather PAY FOR A DOWNLOADED DIGITAL COPY THAT I AM FREE TO MOVE TO ANY OF MY TVs, MY iPad or iPod, than PAY FOR THEIR NO-COPY RESTRICTED BLU-RAYs or DVDs. STALIN & MAO are both smiling in their graves at this KAL announcement; but, I predict that THE FREE MARKET WILL, VERY SOON, RENDER THESE CONTROL-FREAK COMPANIES BANKRUPT! It starts, right here, right now, with me!
There are many great minds in the world to solve problems like robots on Mars, cures for cancer, etc., and we just wasted a few of them on a solution for backwards thinking Hollywood studio execs.
Congrats America! We’re circling the technology toilet.
@Paul,
Yes I agree. I WISH I could offer another elegant and “legal” solution, but unfortunately I cant. And I know that like me, the rest of you are just as frustrated as hell that WE CANT!!
I didnt really want to say this eariler, but what I think IS REALLY going on here with this very ANTIQUATED approach is really setting up a final last ditch “Hail Mary” Play that K might have to toss.
What I mean is, I really believe that there is MUCH MORE going on behind the scenes legally than the rest of us are privy to right now. And the rash of Server Companies folding up their tents all at once lately leads me to believe this.
With all the legal issues hanging over K’s head right now, this may not really be a BLURAY solution at all, but a “solution” that they may end up having to offer if they LOSE the upcoming legal battles with respect to DRM and ripping PERIOD!
Call me nuts, but crazier things have happened. What if some crack pot judge totally rules AGAINST K. in the near future??
A changer based solution may end up being the ONLY LEGAL solution that even allows them to use REGULAR DVD’s!!!
I mean, isnt that what the current cases still open against K. are all about? That Hollywood doesn’t even want people to be able to RIP the REGULAR DVD’s that they own??
I heard a suggestion years ago that seemed like a great solution to me - a bar code scanner attached the Kscape system. When the client purchased a new Blu-ray, he would put the disc in the Kscape tray to import it. Then while it was being imported, he’d scan the bar code that only exists on the cover of the movie case.
This would eliminate the ability to copy discs from Netflix, Blockbuster etc. A client could still conceivably copy a neighbor’s movie, but it would kill the much larger problem of assembly line style importation with a Netflix plan.
Guys,
If you want to be able to play back BDs from a server, just buy one from the guys that make servers that will let you do it (S1Digital, Niveus, VB, etc) Simple! No need to get your knickers in a knot about K if they want to do it this way…
Wow! This has got to be the best way for hackers to keep doing what they are doing. I really like the idea of the copy code. I think that it is ridiculous to say that the server needs a disc in the tray. After all the legal battling with the gloves on, this is what was put on the table? To even say that this is a viable temporary solution is hilarious. I give up on disc media. The sooner we get to ownership over the internet and just stream from a remote server in cyberspace the better.
Totally useless and pointless.
Is this some kind of a joke? Why would anyone (besides those with more money than brains) want to go with this solution. And their changer won’t be out until 2011? You can use a Dune player and NAS setup running My Movies TODAY for a fraction of the cost of K-Scape, and have a very elegant, efficient interface. K-Scape is really behind the times.
@ Paul, it is my understanding that these laws are across the board. If these other server companies haven’t been hit with a lawsuit yet, this will set the standard. Just because they work now does not mean they can keep doing what they are doing. Where is Escient? GONE! Legal battles are expensive.
As for that AppleTV solution mentioned above, what about lossless audio codecs, and what is the bitrate on the streamed 1080p?
A streaming/downloading solution that offers the full blu ray spec is best for us and Hollywood.
Why would I bother ripping rented blu rays when somebody has already done it for me? Once China gets their hands on the disks for production they are on torrent sites within hours. Physical media is the hole not analog.
They would then need to come up with something for people without broadband.
How about Kscape becoming a BD dealer, just like any other retailer?Their discs will be specially encoded from the Movie producers with a unique code that loads into the player and authorizes play within the Kscape environment only.
The downside to Kscape owners is that they have to buy their movies from them, but if done within 10% of the movie retailer, this would be acceptable. Bulk buys would happen or preloaded content available would be possible. Kscape would record and return the disc and declare the owners.
To have the media in the player reminds me of an XBOX360. That hideous arrangement is not going to go over well, even if just temporary. Kscape is just sinking in a sea of technology passing them by. This is just a lifejacket. It won’t protect you from the sharks.
Where is Joel Degray on this one?
Joel, any insight into this solution? I know you might like it as you can sell more drive space to redundantly store info that is already stored on a disc, that has to be in the tray to play in the first place.
Again, I resubmit my business proposition to K-Scape that they become a GUI and Media Management Software company and license their software to people who want to manage their media. You have no more liability in that sense than does Microsoft when they provide a sortable folder for your your pirated MP3’s and torrents to live in
They have instead just morphed into the Elan of old with their ViaDVDJ and the Sony 777ES DVD Changer. g! I wonder why that went away. . .
Joel, you can still sell drive space, people need it. You just can’t sell it all to one company now. Get the marketing people turning on a B2C strategy.
The studios are doing what CEDIA instructor Rich Green would call disintermediation, getting us as integrators out of the way, to get their digital products and all the associated hardware to manage and play them direct to consumers. We will buy media as a tiered solution, as we will our broadband, paying more for extra formats and extra bandwidth.
Where’s Cisco at ??? I need to be a Health Presence Dealer




Im sorry, but this is a an utterly laughable solution.
Notwitstanding the “temporary” angle, are we then to understand that the sole purpose of then releasing a 100 disc changer or vault or whatever the want to call it to act as a glorified bookshelf? Nothing more than a placed to put a disc so that it can check that the client owns it??
So what will these 100 disc Changers cost each? Given that they will be K branded, I am going to guess $ 4,500??
So this then is the state of our industry for clients who want a “legal” Bluray solution??
And eyes will roll in 3….2….1