Search CE Pro






Print  |  Email  |  Comments (11)  |  Share  |  News  |  Follow on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ or RSS

Honeywell HDMI Cable Earns Highest DPL Rating

Genesis Crystal 7000 Series 0.5-meter HDMI cable earns “5” rating in Class C.


image

Honeywell’s Genesis Crystal 7000 Series HDMI cables earned the DPL’s highest rating.

DPL Laboratories has released Digital Performance Level ratings (DPL ratings) on several Honeywell HDMI cables.

Honeywell's Genesis Crystal 7000 Series 0.5-meter HDMI cable earned a "5" or "best" rating in both the Class B and Class C categories. This was the first-ever "5" rating in DPL's Class C testing category.

Honeywell provided 11 HDMI models from its Cure Light Technology line and Genesis Crystal 7000 Series. The HDMI cables were tested and rated in both the Class B and Class C categories.

The testing process subjected the cables to a testing regime to determine their relative performance against DPL’s standard and then rated them on a numeric 1-to-5 scale based on performance.

“Honeywell’s DPL ratings show that when a manufacturer really cares about building a better product, technologies like HDMI – which can be challenging to manufacture – can be built to a consistently higher performance standard," says DPL Labs president Jeff Boccaccio.

DPL has three testing classifications to better track and report the performance of HDMI cables:

DPL Testing Classifications

ClassResolutionClock SpeedRefresh RateColor Depth
Class A720p74.2560 Hz8-Bit
Class A1080i74.2530 Hz8-Bit
Class B1080p16560 Hz8-Bit
Class B720p/1080i165120 Hz8-Bit
Class C1080p29760 Hz16-Bit Deep Color
Class C720p/1080i297120 Hz16-Bit Deep Color

(Editor's Note: Boccaccio is a regular contributor to CE Pro's HDMI Corner. CE Pro is not affiliated with the DPL Labs rating system.)

Subscribe to the CE Pro Newsletter

Article Topics

News · Product News · Wire and Cable · Wire And Cable · All topics

About the Author

Jason Knott, Editor, CE Pro
Jason has covered low-voltage electronics as an editor since 1990. He joined EH Publishing in 2000, and before that served as publisher and editor of Security Sales, a leading magazine for the security industry. He served as chairman of the Security Industry Association’s Education Committee from 2000-2004 and sat on the board of that association from 1998-2002. He is also a former board member of the Alarm Industry Research and Educational Foundation. He is currently a member of the CEDIA Education Action Team for Electronic Systems Business. Jason graduated from the University of Southern California.

11 Comments (displayed in order by date/time)

Posted by WetLight  on  08/14  at  02:32 AM

Hi, and how much will it retail for? Also, where can i get some sort of comparison between this cable and the others outthere?
Thanks!

Posted by FoxyMulder  on  08/14  at  02:51 AM

They have obviously paid for these tests thus the results are no surprise.

Pointless reporting on this and a pointless article as most HDMI cables will do just as good a job without you having to spend a small fortune…I recommend IXOS myself.

Posted by CybrSage  on  08/14  at  05:47 AM

DUH!  ALL companies pay to have their items certified by whatever standards group does the certification.

Do you think Underwriters Laboratory does the work for free?  Nope.  DPL does not do it for free either.

The cable earned the rating it received.

As for being pointless, that is for the buyer to decide.  I have seen $15,000 speakers.  If someone is spending that much case, the price of this cable is minor - especially when it has been proven to be the best there is.  No snake oil needed.

Posted by LightningRod  on  08/14  at  07:25 AM

The article is meaningless.  Yu show the classes but NOT the performance criteria, such as bit error rate.  Bottom line, can a large, diversem group of viewers tell the difference between this cable and a lower-rated one in a true double blind viewing test.  We’re not idiots, show us the data and run REAL tests.

Posted by Jason Knott  on  08/14  at  07:52 AM

You should contact DPL Labs directly to obtain more in-depth performance testing results if you are interested.

Posted by Truth  on  08/14  at  02:38 PM

If you have experienced an HDMI issue related to the cable, that does not automatically make it a problem. If anything, it most likely means its a chipset problem in the TV set that cannot recover the signal adequately across all cable variations.  Plain and Simple. 

And there is no quality of cable that can made a bad chipset work well.  Unfortunately, HDMI allows for much lower quality chipsets compared to something like Gigabit Ethernet.

Posted by Truth  on  08/14  at  02:42 PM

first sentence should say “make it a CABLE problem”. 

don’t buy this expensive hype, you’ll likely never see any source device transport 16-bit depth color content or 120Hz refresh rates across a cable.

Posted by Moviegeek  on  08/14  at  06:05 PM

Most .5m cables could pass this test ,let’s see them make a 15m cable pass these tests and I will be impressed.
BTW..I also want to know how much these cables cost,I’ll bet an arm and a leg.

Posted by Brent McCall  on  08/15  at  04:46 AM

“They have obviously paid for these tests thus the results are no surprise.”

They do not pay for the results only the procedure. It is not uncommon to send in a product several times (costing each time) to get the score that a mfg. wants. While there is a very defined math to the build of a cable it is hard (and expensive) to apply this to the actual build process.

“don’t buy this expensive hype, you’ll likely never see any source device transport 16-bit depth color content or 120Hz refresh rates across a cable.”

You are kidding right.

“Most .5m cables could pass this test ,let’s see them make a 15m cable pass these tests and I will be impressed.”

As a competitor to Honeywell I can tell you that very few cables can/will pass this level of testing (much stricter than what HDMI LLC requires). I do not think that you will see a cable longer than 6 meters that will truly support 1.3 deep color (at least in the near future).

When DPL gives their results to a mfg. it is up to the mfg. to decide if the score is relevant to the price point of the product, it is expensive and time consuming to create a level 4 or 5 cable (high throw away rate) .

This program has already increased the overall performance level of the participating companies (simply because they all want to get a better score than their compitition).

Posted by Robert Archer  on  08/15  at  05:52 AM

It is common for a manufacturer to work with an outside certification firm like UL, THX or in this case DPL to ensure that the cable performs up to the testing criterion.

Many products fail and through the commmunication process between these firms and the manufacturer they can solve the problems that prevent a product from receiving whatever certification it is going after.

Posted by Guillermo Rayas  on  08/18  at  08:52 PM

It Is Sad How Many People React For Something That They Think Is Too Expensive Just Because They Don’t Want To Pay For It.  Many Of Them Think That All Cables Are The Same.  Well One Thing I Know Is True, Tests Don’t Lie.  Either You Like The Results Or Not.  Every Cable Will Perform Differently.  Doesn’t Make Any Sense To Me To Buy A $50,000 Projector, A $5,000 Screen, A $3,000 Blu-ray Player And A $15.00 HDMI Cable To Make The Connection.  It Is Kind Of Like When You Put Synthetic Oil And Premium Gasoline In Your Engine.  You Might Not Notice The Difference But The Dynamo Test Will Show It.  Just Think About It.  Silver And Copper Have Different Element Caracteristics And Therefore When Compared In Any Situation, They Will Perform Differently.  Please Don’t Hate.  Peace…

Page 1 of 1 comment pages
Post a comment
Name:
Email:
Choose smileys | View comment guidelines
Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Sponsored Links

  About Us Customer Service Privacy Policy Contact Us Advertise With Us Dealer Services Subscribe ©2012 CE Pro
  EH Network: Electronic House Electronic House Ideas Commercial Integrator ChannelPro ProSoundWeb Church Production Worship Facilities Electronic House Expo Worship Facilities Expo