Vivint Denied Fla. Door-to-Door License; Claims Unconstitutional
Alarm company says all applicants for peddlers' licenses should be evaluated equally, regardless of what they sell.
Vivint expects to sell more than 200,000 security systems this year summer via 5,000 door-to-door salespeople in 49 states.
The alarm company Vivint has perhaps one of the biggest door-to-door sales organizations in the country. In each jurisdiction, the Provo, Utah-based company must apply for a peddler’s license for each of its thousands of salespeople.
In Lake Wales, Fla., Vivint’s 23 applications were denied, even though the city does allow door-to-door solicitations. Vivint challenged the ruling and won the right to reapply, according to local news organization News Chief.
According to News Chief, city commissioners had some misgivings about door-to-door sales of security systems:
Such a basis for denial is unconstitutional, according to Vivint attorney Dylan Rivers of Ausley & McMullen in Orlando.
News Chief explains:
Furthermore, the city of Lake Wales had denied all 23 Vivint applications on the basis of one bad egg and a few incomplete applications, as well as complaints against Vivint filed with the Better Business Bureau.
Attorneys for the company argued that applications must be judged on the character of each applicant, not on the reputation of the company.
Vivint was granted permission by the city to reapply for the licenses.
The company expects to sell over 200,000 alarm systems this season via 5,000 summer sales associates in 49 states.
In Lake Wales, Fla., Vivint’s 23 applications were denied, even though the city does allow door-to-door solicitations. Vivint challenged the ruling and won the right to reapply, according to local news organization News Chief.
According to News Chief, city commissioners had some misgivings about door-to-door sales of security systems:
City Commissioner Betty Wojcik said being able to tell a stranger at the door whether or not a home has a security system would require a high level of trust on the part of residents.
Such a basis for denial is unconstitutional, according to Vivint attorney Dylan Rivers of Ausley & McMullen in Orlando.
News Chief explains:
His final argument … was that there is a legal basis to have the city ordinance declared unconstitutional, since standards must always be applied the same to each person or entity.
He cited case law in Florida and with the U.S. Supreme Court, and said an ordinance that was "identical almost to the word" was declared unconstitutional in a Louisiana federal court.
Furthermore, the city of Lake Wales had denied all 23 Vivint applications on the basis of one bad egg and a few incomplete applications, as well as complaints against Vivint filed with the Better Business Bureau.
Attorneys for the company argued that applications must be judged on the character of each applicant, not on the reputation of the company.
Vivint was granted permission by the city to reapply for the licenses.
The company expects to sell over 200,000 alarm systems this season via 5,000 summer sales associates in 49 states.
Subscribe to the CE Pro Newsletter
Read more Legal stories
Leviton Scores Big Patent Win on GFCI TechnologySurvey: Kaleidescape Dealers ‘Not Really’ Worried About Legal Liability
Kaleidescape CEO ‘Shocked’ at Extreme Injunction Against DVD Movie Servers
Kaleidescape, ‘Agents’ Enjoined from Selling, Supporting Movie Servers
UEI Sues URC for Infringing on Remote Control Patents
More in Legal
Article Topics
News · Business Resources · Home Automation and Control · Security · Legal · Vivint ·About the Author

Julie Jacobson, Editor-at-large, CE Pro
Julie Jacobson is co-founder of EH Publishing and currently spends most of her time writing for CE Pro, mostly in the areas of home automation, networked A/V and the business of home systems integration. She majored in Economics at the University of Michigan, earned an MBA from the University of Texas at Austin, and has never taken a journalism class in her life. Julie is a washed-up Ultimate Frisbee player with the scars to prove it. Follow her on Twitter @juliejacobson.
1 Comments (displayed in order by date/time)
Page 1 of 1 comment pages



You have a company like Vivint who was formerly APX who did such horrible work it has made other companies have to work that much harder to further themselves from companies like APX and Pinnacle Security. You can’t do years and years of shady work and business and then expect to change your name and have everything be peachy. It’s not fair for you to be denied your peddlers permit, but it’s not fair that you change your name and now everything is ok for you to start selling again.