ADT Launches Full Offensive vs. Predatory Alarm Companies
ADT is offering whistleblowers a reward for identifying security sales scams.
“ADT’s trusted brand is being exploited by swindlers and scammers who mislead unsuspecting consumers,” says David Bleisch, ADT general counsel. “Victims end up having their ADT security systems unnecessarily replaced and are duped into signing new contracts with another provider.”
As evidence of this alleged duping, Bleisch showed a two-minute sales training tape shot on a phone that ADT reportedly obtained from a whistleblower. In the video, an alarm company sales trainer is talking to his prospective sales team and giving them step-by-step instructions on how to qualify the homeowner as a takeover candidate.
In the tape, the trainer specifically mentions ADT and also claims to be from “GE,” which is a reference to General Electric, the former owners of Interlogix (now owned by United Technologies).
CE Pro could not independently verify the legitimacy of the tape; however, ADT’s chief legal officer David Bleisch as well as other news organizations have identified the source as being from Orem, Utah-based Vision Security. For its part, in a report from local Salt Lake City TV station KUTV, Vision denies using predatory tactics and has even issued a $10,000 reward itself for any information that leads to the prosecution of a Vision employee for misleading sales tactics. In that same KUTV report, Vision notes that ADT was sued last year by the FTC for using paid endorsers as independent reviewers.
“Only 4 percent of scammed clients will ever file a complaint,” says Larry Harrington, chief policy deputy from the Tennessee Attorney General’s Office. He says that many homeowners don’t even realize they have been duped and when they do, they often believe there is no fraud taking place because they have actually signed a contract (usually 5 years) and actual alarm monitoring services are being provided.
“Being skeptical does not mean you are being rude,” says Harrington, referring to often elderly homeowners who do not want to ask an in-home salesperson to leave because they are too polite. “They don’t know that the misconduct should not be misconstrued as a simple business dispute. Many times, the unscrupulous alarm company will put language in the contract that makes it seem that the homeowner can’t fight it,” says Harrington, who says the summertime is when these scams are at their peak.
Among the common deceptive sales practices he cited are:
- Making misleading statements about the lack of quality of a homeowner’s existing system
- Starting the installation before the contract is signed
- Falsely representing themselves as being from the homeowner’s existing alarm company
- Falsely representing themselves as being from the equipment manufacturer
- Falsely stating that the existing alarm company is ‘going out of business
ESA Oops Moment?
As part of the press conference, Electronic Security Association (ESA) president John Knox spoke about how the association’s 2,000 members are required to sign a “Code of Ethics” that prohibits them from using predatory sales practices such as these.
“We demand it,” says Knox, who specifically mentioned that the Code has been updated to include this. Ironically, the company that ADT was alleging uses those practices as identified by Bleisch—Vision Security—is a current member of the Electronic Security Association of Utah.
Pam Petrow, president of the Central Station Alarm Association (CSAA), also spoke, noting, “Trust is a key element between an alarm company and their customers. This violation of that trust cannot be tolerated.”
Tom Davis, community chairman of the North Murfreesboro Alliance, a homeowners’ association in the Nashville area, also spoke at the press conference. Davis says that at least eight homeowners in the community have fallen prey to the scams. “These are very likable and personable young men,” he says in reference to the alleged scam artists. “In one instance, the salesman arrived at the home at 8 p.m., the contract was signed at 8:35 p.m., and someone was there starting the installation at 9 p.m.”
As part of the scam, Davis says the homeowners are told that that they have a ‘one-month trial period’ on the alarm system, which purposefully is designed to let the homeowner miss the three-day right of rescission clause in the contract. In North Murfreesboro, the city does not have a door-to-door sales license requirement, so there is no municipal resource available for a homeowner to help them.
“There are a lot of bad actors out there,” says Bleisch of ADT, the No. 3 company on the CE Pro 100. “A few bad apples that teach deceptive sales practices hurts the industry’s integrity. That’s why we are fighting. As the largest alarm company, our clients fall prey the most.”