Home Theater

Monster Products Files $300M Cryptocurrency Offering for ‘Monster Money’

Iconic Monster Products looks to pivot to blockchain and cryptocurrency from halcyon days of premium speaker cables; files S-1 with SEC for "initial currency offering" (ICO) of 300 million Monster Money (MMNY) tokens.

Monster Products Files $300M Cryptocurrency Offering for ‘Monster Money’
Monster Products (Monster Cable) founder Noel Lee is making a $300M bet on transitioning his iconic consumer electronics brand into a blockchain and cryptocurrency powerhouse. The sales and marketing legend hopes to sell 300 million Monster Money (MMNY) tokens through the ICO.

Julie Jacobson · May 31, 2018

Monster Products, Inc. (formerly Monster Cable) has filed an S-1 form with the SEC for a $300 million cryptocurrency offering. It’s not an IPO per se, but an “initial coin offering” (ICO) for 300 million brand new Monster Money (MMNY) tokens, which can be used to purchase Monster products such as HDMI cables, headphones and surge protectors.

That is, the tokens can be used to purchase Monster products if the company can build out its Ethereum-based blockchain engine to process MMNY orders.

In fact, there are a lot of “ifs” in the S-1 filing – seemingly more iffy than the standard, overly conservative IPO filing.

First are the risks related to Monster’s business, which has suffered mightily over the past few years.

Monster is one of the most iconic brands in consumer electronics, making its name in the premium-cable business before it branched into other CE products. Founder and Head Monster Noel Lee elevated and invented product categories from stale classics, much like Nest did with thermostats. Nobody would think to purchase $25 speaker cable until Monster came along. Bose was the only boring headphone brand in town until Monster rolled out Beats by Dr. Dre. And Noel Lee made a fortune bottling cleaning solution for TVs and monitors. He encouraged retailers to put Monster ScreenClean spritzers at the cash register -- which chachinged all day long with each $25 sale.

“Eventually Monster hopes to use its influence, scale and global connections along with blockchain technology to bring a number of E-commerce platforms onto Monster Money Network ...."
— Monster Products
S-1 filing with SEC

Lee is famous in CE circles as a sales and marketing genius who helped all the big retailers merchandise high-margin gear.

But the company has suffered over the past few years, especially since losing its licensing deal with Dr. Dre six years ago.

Monster had a net loss of nearly $27 million in 2017, and $29 million in 2016, as reported in the S-1. In the first quarter of 2018, net losses amounted to about $19.6 million. As of December 31, 2017, the company had negative working capital of nearly $76 million.

“We anticipate that we will incur operating losses for the foreseeable future,” Monster reports.

At the end of 2017, independent auditors indicated “substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.”

Following its expensive split with Dr. Dre, as well as an ongoing lawsuit over allegedly false claims related to HDMI cables, Monster is shifting gears from being a pure-play products company to becoming a universal platform for blockchain-driven transactions.

“Eventually Monster hopes to use its influence, scale and global connections along with blockchain technology to bring a number of E-commerce platforms onto Monster Money Network where transactions will be processed and completed instantly with low or no transaction costs,” according to the S-1 filing.

And more from the S-1:

Monster’s current business strategy is shifting focus away from simply building its product range to pursuing alternative retail platforms and implementing new marketing campaigns. Over the next five years, Monster’s business strategy is to revitalize relationships with the Company’s existing retail relationships as well as target expansion into new retail venues. The Company is developing relationships with a number of world renowned fortune 500 companies. …

As we develop Monster Money Network and our backend systems, we intend to utilize the blockchain technology to our marketing, accounting and audit, internal control and shipping management functions. We believe the blockchain innovation will bring disruptive advancement to our E-commerce and business operation systems.

Monster says in the S-1 that it needs to raise the full $300M from the ICO to develop its blockchain technology “as contemplated.” If the company can’t raise the funds, it will have to seek additional funding, and if it can’t secure that funding, “we may be required to modify or suspend our business plan, which could result in investors losing all or most of their investments.”

Monster Products financials for years ended 2016 and 2017. Losses in Q1 2018 amounted to $19.6 million.

And then the Risks of Launching a Crypto Currency

Beyond the risks associated with Monster’s viability as a company, there are additional risks concerning cryptocurrency in general, and Monster’s ability to run a blockchain exchange in particular.

“So far, there hasn't been an example of a non-blockchain company moving into decentralized software from a position of strength,” reports the crypto-asset publication CoinDesk, “and Monster appears (at first glance) to be no different.”

Furthermore, Monster seems to be the first established consumer brand to pivot to a blockchain revenue model, according to CoinDesk: "The ICO fits into a larger trend in the token space of existing companies that have struggled with their revenue model pivoting to blockchain in an attempt to attain profitability. In the past, pre-existing tech companies with venture backing have launched ICOs (Listia and YouNow), but this is the first longstanding consumer product to do so."

Monster notes several risks related to its MMNY network and tokens:

  • The Monster Money Network may not be widely adopted and may have limited number of active users.
  • Alternative networks may be established that compete with or are more widely used than the Monster Money Network. We may face significant competition.
  • The Monster Money Network may be the target of malicious cyber attacks or may contain exploitable flaws in its underlying code, which may result in security breaches and the loss or theft of Tokens.
  • Our Monster Money Network uses and relies on Ethereum framework. If the Ethereum framework were to become unavailable to the Monster Money Network for some reason, our operations on Monster Money Network would be disrupted for a period of time until we migrate our data to an alternate blockchain framework or develop our own system.
  • The regulatory regime governing the blockchain technologies, cryptocurrencies, tokens and token Offerings, such as MMNY Tokens, is uncertain, and new regulations or policies may adversely affect the development of the Monster Money Network and MMNY Tokens.
  • This issuance of MMNY Tokens may constitute the issuance of a “security” under U.S. federal securities laws.
  • We may not receive necessary regulatory approvals to publicly offer MMNY Tokens via this registration statement.
  • The holders of MMNY Tokens and Company will have limited or no control over the Ethereum blockchain framework and the holders of MMNY Tokens will not have rights as stockholders of the Company.
  • The public trading of MMNY Tokens on a cryptocurrency exchange may not occur by June 30, 2020 or may be ceased due to government enforcement actions, in which case holders of MMNY Tokens who purchase MMNY Tokens pursuant to this prospectus will be able to convert their MMNY Tokens into the Company’s Common Stock.
  • We have not identified all the persons that we will need to provide services and functions critical to the development and maintenance of Monster Money Network and no assurance can be given that we will be able to engage the necessary persons on acceptable terms, if at all.
  • We may be unable to protect our proprietary technology or keep up with that of our competitors.

No Public Market for Monster Tokens?

The real question is: will Monster Money ever have value beyond its use as a currency for Monster products?

The coins will be a tough sell if they cannot be traded in a public exchange. In the event a public market doesn’t open for MMNY, owners can swap the tokens for Monster common stock at a rate of four coins per share. But the Monster stock itself may never be available on an open exchange:

There is currently no public or other market for our MMNY Tokens or our Common Stock. We intend to seek listing MMNY Tokens on a recognizable cryptocurrency exchange and trading our Common Stock on a stock market or exchange. We may never list MMNY Tokens on such cryptocurrency market or exchange or develop a liquid trading market for MMNY Tokens or our Common Stock.

Even if MMNY Tokens or our Common Stock becomes traded on a market or exchange, we cannot predict when an active trading market of MMNY Tokens or our Common Stock will develop or how liquid that market might become. An active public market for MMNY Tokens or our Common Stock may not develop or be sustained. If an active public market does not develop or is not sustained for MMNY Tokens or our Common Stock, it may be difficult for you to sell your MMNY Tokens or shares of Common Stock in the event of conversion at a price that is attractive to you, or at all.

Earlier this year, Monster engaged in a reverse acquisition by a “blank-check” company called Atlantic Acquisition (ATACU), formed in 2016 for just such a purpose. Atlantic, a Nevada corporation, is now Monster Products, Inc.

The biggest chunk of MMNY proceeds would go to developing the blockchain asset, but about 40% would go towards marketing and partnership development.


Find Out Why 63% of Integrators Expect Outdoor Business to Grow - CE Pro Download

The outdoor technology market is growing – both the demand from customers and the array of products available. According to our recent CE Pro survey, integrators are taking advantage of this opportunity to grow their businesses. Get your copy of the survey today.




  About the Author

Julie Jacobson is founding editor of CE Pro, the leading media brand for the home-technology channel. She has covered the smart-home industry since 1994, long before there was much of an Internet, let alone an Internet of things. Currently she studies, speaks, writes and rabble-rouses in the areas of home automation, security, networked A/V, wellness-related technology, biophilic design, and the business of home technology. Julie majored in Economics at the University of Michigan, spent a year abroad at Cambridge University, and earned an MBA from the University of Texas at Austin. She is a recipient of the annual CTA TechHome Leadership Award, and a CEDIA Fellows honoree. A washed-up Ultimate Frisbee player, Julie currently resides in San Antonio, Texas and sometimes St. Paul, Minn. Follow on Twitter: @juliejacobson Email Julie at julie.jacobson@emeraldexpo.com

Follow Julie on social media:
Twitter · LinkedIn · Google+

Julie also participates in these groups:
LinkedIn · Google+

View Julie Jacobson's complete profile.



  Article Topics


Home Theater · Audio/Video · News · IPO · Monster · Retail · All Topics
CE Pro Magazine

Read More Articles Like This… With A Free Subscription

CE Pro magazine is the resource you need to keep up-to-date on the latest products, techniques, designs and business practices. Subscribe today!

Subscribe Today!

Comments

Posted by Steveo on May 31, 2018

OK, My “IC” Coin (Ice Cream Coin or ICE Coin) venture seems viable. As soon as I can find the proper commodity market metrics to underpin the global value of ice cream, I’ll get my ledger up and running. 1st one to send me $1K gets a freebie sugar-cone! Who needs mining, fiat, gold, silver or headphone indemnification when everyone is literally eating up your offering!

BTW~ Solid shout-out to Julie for providing such “meaty” journalism to an industry rife with marketing and hype. I apologize for making jokes about such a serious subject, but crazy ideas taken seriously sometimes need a silly counterbalance. Keep it up J.J.!

Posted by RobMacK on May 31, 2018

I’m not a Noel Lee fan at all (as some will readily attest to) but I like (some) Monster products. I’m still using the in-ear headphone buds he gave out at the CE Pro Top 100 meeting in Los Angeles years ago. And yes, as Julie mentions, I too have that bottle of screen cleaner in a few clients’ homes- they love the stuff.

But this obviously desperate short-term funding tactic is just another stumbling block on the path that Monster is determined to build for themselves. ICO! Blockchain! Cryptocurrency! Ethereum! All the buzzwords are there but when you look at the small print, to me it looks like just another attempt to get some capital to prop up your struggling company. The gift card analogy is correct here- it’s been done before and will be done again and again and again.

Also Steveo: sign me up as well for your free ice cream bars C-C deal…

Posted by Frederick Ampel on May 31, 2018

I’ll join SteveO’s lifetime icecream redemption scheme

Posted by Steveo on May 31, 2018

Bad idea - don’t take the bait! Think of these offerings by product manufacturers as nothing more than advanced purchases of “Gift Cards” to fund current operations by robbing future sales - no real practical difference when you call it Crypto. Block Chain certainly has a role in ledger truth, but underlying company strength and ability to fulfill wild redemption of the “currency” is the real risk point.
Maybe if they paid interest and treated this like a bond offering, people could buy in under typical investor caveats and diligence. Otherwise, get ready to either get headphones and cables for life at the bankruptcy auction or a suffer financial smack-down. I rather buy a Crypto-Currency for a life-time redemption of ice cream bars.

Posted by Frederick Ampel on May 31, 2018

Desperation it may be but it’s not officially being presented that way- its a business “opportunity” for those who like HIGH-risk plays-

Posted by iKnowTech on May 31, 2018

Smells like desperation to me.

Posted by Frederick Ampel on May 31, 2018

IF, and it’s a huge IF Is there anyone is willing to undertake what is clearly an extremely high-risk bet, given the pages of caveats included in the filing and the literally dozens of ways this could go sideways or collapse, it will be a major coup for Mr. Lee. However, how many ULTRA-High risk players are there who would essentially risk a 100% loss on this plan- probably not enough to make it fly. It seems a strange move for a company already in severe fiscal straights [ As of December 31, 2017, the company had negative working capital of nearly $76 million.“We anticipate that we will incur operating losses for the foreseeable future,” from their own statements] to stick its neck out on such a risky option like an ICO, especially with the as yet proven Ethereum structure as a backbone. Certainly, worth keeping a weather eye peeled but sounds like a bit of ‘we need to do something’ to change the game mindset.

Posted by Blefadts on May 31, 2018

Good luck with that

Posted by Blefadts on May 31, 2018

Good luck with that

Posted by Frederick Ampel on May 31, 2018

IF, and it’s a huge IF Is there anyone is willing to undertake what is clearly an extremely high-risk bet, given the pages of caveats included in the filing and the literally dozens of ways this could go sideways or collapse, it will be a major coup for Mr. Lee. However, how many ULTRA-High risk players are there who would essentially risk a 100% loss on this plan- probably not enough to make it fly. It seems a strange move for a company already in severe fiscal straights [ As of December 31, 2017, the company had negative working capital of nearly $76 million.“We anticipate that we will incur operating losses for the foreseeable future,” from their own statements] to stick its neck out on such a risky option like an ICO, especially with the as yet proven Ethereum structure as a backbone. Certainly, worth keeping a weather eye peeled but sounds like a bit of ‘we need to do something’ to change the game mindset.

Posted by iKnowTech on May 31, 2018

Smells like desperation to me.

Posted by Frederick Ampel on May 31, 2018

Desperation it may be but it’s not officially being presented that way- its a business “opportunity” for those who like HIGH-risk plays-

Posted by Steveo on May 31, 2018

Bad idea - don’t take the bait! Think of these offerings by product manufacturers as nothing more than advanced purchases of “Gift Cards” to fund current operations by robbing future sales - no real practical difference when you call it Crypto. Block Chain certainly has a role in ledger truth, but underlying company strength and ability to fulfill wild redemption of the “currency” is the real risk point.
Maybe if they paid interest and treated this like a bond offering, people could buy in under typical investor caveats and diligence. Otherwise, get ready to either get headphones and cables for life at the bankruptcy auction or a suffer financial smack-down. I rather buy a Crypto-Currency for a life-time redemption of ice cream bars.

Posted by Frederick Ampel on May 31, 2018

I’ll join SteveO’s lifetime icecream redemption scheme

Posted by RobMacK on May 31, 2018

I’m not a Noel Lee fan at all (as some will readily attest to) but I like (some) Monster products. I’m still using the in-ear headphone buds he gave out at the CE Pro Top 100 meeting in Los Angeles years ago. And yes, as Julie mentions, I too have that bottle of screen cleaner in a few clients’ homes- they love the stuff.

But this obviously desperate short-term funding tactic is just another stumbling block on the path that Monster is determined to build for themselves. ICO! Blockchain! Cryptocurrency! Ethereum! All the buzzwords are there but when you look at the small print, to me it looks like just another attempt to get some capital to prop up your struggling company. The gift card analogy is correct here- it’s been done before and will be done again and again and again.

Also Steveo: sign me up as well for your free ice cream bars C-C deal…

Posted by Steveo on May 31, 2018

OK, My “IC” Coin (Ice Cream Coin or ICE Coin) venture seems viable. As soon as I can find the proper commodity market metrics to underpin the global value of ice cream, I’ll get my ledger up and running. 1st one to send me $1K gets a freebie sugar-cone! Who needs mining, fiat, gold, silver or headphone indemnification when everyone is literally eating up your offering!

BTW~ Solid shout-out to Julie for providing such “meaty” journalism to an industry rife with marketing and hype. I apologize for making jokes about such a serious subject, but crazy ideas taken seriously sometimes need a silly counterbalance. Keep it up J.J.!