@ Jason: Initially I’d thought you should be saying
“... top-down selling, where you pitch your “best” before your “better” before your *good* ”
instead of “best” -> “better” -> “best” as you’ve said.
However, after I’ve read the linked Guenther article, someone who pushes only its “best”, without even having demo for its middle and bottom product line, that way you’d stated is just evidencing the possession of inside information captured from the Guenther approach, with the side effect of being inviting us to take a broad view of negotiations at the same time. Thanks that way you worded it and at least I’d browsed the cited article ;-D.
I’ve found that the Guenther “top-down best -> better -> best” approach is a very practical one, and indeed it’s a way to push our “best” product. Not that I’d being able to read between the lines completely capturing why this method had worked for him, but at least I’d gained some insight on how to try to connect our “best” with what our customer wants to buy, even without pre-knowing its own budget (the hard number), which happens very often. Summing up it is very instructive article and I’m glad of having stopped by your words.